Scientists Use Machine Learning to Map How Complex Smells Relate
A new machine-learning model predicts how similar mixtures of odors smell to each other, a step toward digitizing scent the way color and sound have been digitized.
Step by step
- 1
Compile odor-mixture data from 3 studies
- 2
26 teams compete in DREAM challenge
- 3
Average top models into one ensemble
- 4
Validate on 50 independent mixture pairs
Researchers co-authored by scientists at the Monell Chemical Senses Center have built a machine-learning system that can predict how similar different smell mixtures are to one another, a step toward what the team calls digital olfaction, the ability to digitize scents the way color and sound have long been digitized. The work, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, provides what the researchers describe as a validated metric and benchmark for comparing smells.
Study co-author Joel Mainland of the Monell Center said an earlier 2015 IBM-run DREAM challenge tackled single odor molecules, predicting what one molecule smells like from its chemical structure. But most real-world odors are complex mixtures of dozens or hundreds of molecules, so Mainland and colleagues ran their own DREAM challenge focused on mixtures. They compiled six data sets from three studies into a new set comprising 168 unique single molecules, 731 unique mixtures and 507 mixture-pair measurements, scored on a scale from 0 (indistinguishable) to 1 (most distinct).
Over three months, 26 international teams competed to predict the similarity of paired scents in a hidden test set of 46 mixture pairs, ending in a four-way tie. Mainland's team then built an ensemble model by averaging the four winning teams' predictions with two additional high-performing models, and validated it on an independent set of 50 mixture pairs. The final model achieved a median root mean square error of 0.08 and a Pearson correlation of 0.57, which the researchers said showed good to moderately strong accuracy.
Many sensory scientists had expected predicting mixture similarity to be far harder than predicting single-molecule smells, but that did not turn out to be the case. Mainland said the models were more likely to use everyday descriptive words such as "fruity" and "sweet" than chemistry terms, and removing those semantic labels β tested after a journal reviewer's request β made predictions notably harder. The team is now preparing results from a third DREAM Olfaction challenge, in which predicting a mixture's smell from its individual components' known smells worked out to be roughly an average of the parts.
Terms explained
The story so far
- Constraint-aware GPU scheduler beats FIFO by up to 33 points on utilization, benchmark shows
- 1,200 volunteers reproduced 2,226 ICML 2026 papers in 19 days; nearly a quarter had claims falsified
- New End-to-End Design Process Produces Two Low-Cost Materials to Capture Methane
- Rock in Eastern India Holds Oldest Directly Dated Trace of Life, at 3.5 Billion Years
- Soil Microbes May Absorb Far More Methane Than Thought, Three-Model Study Finds
- AI Mines 448 Research Papers to Discover New Heat-Stable, Lead-Free Materials
- Scientists Use Machine Learning to Map How Complex Smells Relate
